Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kris Van Wyk vs Stuart Parker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wyk vs Parker analysis and find out who is favored!
Kris Van Wyk vs Stuart Parker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wyk 0 - 0 Parker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wyk has won 48.99% of points on his second serve, while Parker has won 51.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wyk, in recent form, has won 53.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Parker has won 53.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.25% and 38.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wyk has saved 54.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Parker has saved 58.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wyk has won 62.89% of matches played (W/L 61/ 36), with Parker winning 68.97% (W/L 40/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 148/ 82), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Parker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 128/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Wyk has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.13% of matches (W/L 59/ 33), where as Parker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 35/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wyk has played against opponents with an average rank of 112.03 while Parker has played against players with an average rank of 170.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wyk has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Parker has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wyk has converted 46.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Parker has converted 48.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
422
Rank
365
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
548
Rank
346
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
64% (149-84)
Career Total W/L
65% (181-97)
63% (27-16)
YTD W/L
82% (23-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kris Van Wyk | Stuart Parker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (27/16) | 82% (23/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (57/42) | 80% (44/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (487/418) | 60% (319/216) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (27/16) | 79% (19/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 203 | 77 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 185 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:31 | 1:18:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 128.19 | 171.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1676/2830) | 68% (969/1425) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1130/1676) | 70% (676/969) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (569/1154) | 52% (236/456) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (161/347) | 49% (86/177) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1298/2968) | 45% (665/1473) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 100% (4/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (25/14) | 79% (19/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (26/42) | 81% (22/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 88% (7/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (10/14) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (22/21) | 100% (21/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (22/1) | 0% (21/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (21/5) | 17% (6/1) |
Kris Van Wyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Jesse Flores
Player
Kris Van Wyk
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Mousa Alkotop
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Karan Singh
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
33 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Kris Van Wyk
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
72%
(
72 of
100)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
53 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Rohan Mehra
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Kris Van Wyk
70%
(
71 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Diogo Marques
59%
(
62 of
105)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Jordan Chiu
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stuart Parker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Karan Singh
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Felipe Virgili Berini
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Maxence Bertimon
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
53%
(
8 of
15)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
19
Total Points Won
18
|
2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Stuart Parker
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Antoine Vincent
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Stuart Parker
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Moerani Bouzige
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Wyk Vs Parker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Stuart Parker
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
